|
|
468 Articles match "Collaboration","Emergent"
|
The Latest from Work Literacy
|
MORE
|
|
Trojan mice approach enterprise 2.0
infoBOOM! Brought to you by CIO IBM English Français Italiano HOME JIM'S PICKS THIS WEEK COMMUNITY ABOUT TOPICS EVENTS Search Register Sign in Invite Enterprise 2.0 This week's topic: Enterprise 2.0
www.theinfoboom.com
- Thursday, March 11, 2010
Enterprise 2.0 Adoption Research from Cecile Demailly
adoptions emerged from the data. collaboration platform.
The third point was, “Networking tools (rich directory, profiles, microblogging, forums, tagging, …) may be deployed just before collaboration tools (wikis, groups, …), or together, rather than the other way around or not being prioritized.” Some of the vendors have recognized this and are prompting their networking tools as a “Trojan horse” before getting into the more complex process of aligning collaboration Cecile Demailly at the French consulting firm, Early Strategies , recently completed an interesting study of enterprise 2.0
The FASTForward Blog
- Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Debate rages: should enterprise software look like Facebook?
Now, he says, enterprise software needs to adopt the collaboration and social networking aspects of sites such as Facebook: “We need to take this idea to our businesses. After all, when the Web and commercial Internet first emerged in the early 1990s, nobody immediately connected the dots between Websites and enterprise applications, which were largely accessed via industrial-strength green-screen terminals directly attached to back-end behemoths. Marc Benioff, chairman and CEO of salesforce.com, raised quite a ruckus across the blogopshere in recent days with his declaration that enterprise software should look like Facebook .
The FASTForward Blog
- Thursday, March 4, 2010
|
-
|
The Best from Work Literacy
|
MORE
|
-
Are you really doing Enterprise 2.0?
emergent approach (with sharing, learning, connections happening along the way). is a technology that allows connections, network effects and emergence that we didn’t have previously, but we all know without participation and management 2.0 is left alone and emergence can happen, but then comes in to guide and facilitate, to make sure it’s adaptive in the best possible way.
The other day I posted on Knowledge flow networks and Post-KM : enterprise 2.0, facilitation and complexity , these along with an older post include how I think KM and enterprise
Library clips
- Thursday, November 13, 2008
-
How do wikis and blogs fit together?
A recent conversation has re-emerged at my work on How do wikis and blogs fit together ?
This is an award winning essay on how information sharing, and collaborative tools allow us to dynamically adapt to a changing environment (from an intelligence agency point of view).
One way is to think of the stock and flow model, wikis have perpetually re-edited pages, whereas blogs have a stream of date-based entries just like newspaper articles.
Wikipages can be seen as more definitive, whereas blog posts are about currency, opinion, etc…
Library clips
- Wednesday, October 8, 2008
-
Emergent practices need practice
Learning as we probe the problem, we gain insight and our practices are emergent (emerging from our interaction with the changing environment and the problem). To deal with increasing complexity, organizations need to support emergent work practices, in addition to their training efforts. They must support collaboration, communication, synthesis, pattern recognition and creative tension, all within a trusting I think that one of the larger problems of our time, is that we we don’t even know how to think about many of today’s problems. We think that our reason
Harold Jarche
- Friday, April 24, 2009
-
-
The top-down and bottom-up creation of enterprise communities, and wikis
Casual communities are like bumping into someone in the coffee room, you never know what may percolate, perhaps a conversation in the bicycle users community will lead to a work oriented task, or finding some information, or wanting to create a new community, or collaborating.
As So when I think about it our communities are transparent and bottom-up in that people participate and interact their know-how, allowing for emergence, but they are not very enterprise 2.0 This is a follow-up to my Community Lessons post, and Community paradox post.
Top-Down community creation
Library clips
- Thursday, December 18, 2008
-
We are more than our job title describes, so let’s get social!
And of course from this we are capitalising on opportunities, and there emerges an element of self organisation and autonomy. There’s lots more benefits like re-use (cost), innovation, opportunities, cooperation, communication, collaboration, awareness, adapt to change, knowledge transfer and retention , talent retention (feeling of belonging, heard, advancing career prospects), etc…
8221;
“…collaboration allows the Here’s an excerpt from a one page flyer I’m doing for Communities of Practice at our work:
“We like to think that people in our [firm] are more than their job title describes, we all have many talents, and we all have many needs to draw on each others talent.
Library clips
- Friday, April 24, 2009
-
OpenTeams - Collaborative Innovation for The Entrepreneurial Organization
In addition to project collaboration , blogging , social networking , community building , and knowledge management , OpenTeams is an innovative initiative development solution where employees collaboratively seed and mature new ideas for additional revenue, productivity, and cost-savings. Unlike normal wikis, which suffer from user apathy and confusion, OpenTeams is intuitive for non-techies to learn and use. This dramatically shrinks the learning curve and ensures adoption while ramping up productivity, payback, and employee engagement.
openteams.com
- Thursday, March 5, 2009
-
-
Do group tools get more traction due to not requiring network effects, and being in the context of certainty
Collaboration vs Participation
Olivier Amprimo has a really good point here, in relation to what I’ve mentioned above, organisations see more immediate value in collaboration spaces rather than participation systems.
“Collaborative tools are made to have people work together on common tasks. He also relates this to adoption:
“The adoption of a collaborative tool focuses on deployment. A while ago I posted that size doesn’t matter when it comes to effective communities. You don’t need a lot of members to make a community
Library clips
- Thursday, May 21, 2009
-
Wikis for exceptions and process failures
These are mostly handled and organised - frameworked - by systems like paper based rules and policies, e-mail, meetings, calls and now in more modern organisations by wikis and other collaboration systems and methods.
Wikis can also display patterns that emerge. My previous blog entry was a follow up on flexible tools not being immune to being used the wrong way. My example was the danger of using a blog as a solution centre due to its news type nature, and rather using a wiki for an official solution centre.
Library clips
- Monday, October 13, 2008
-
Understanding Cisco's Collaboration Strategy (Part1)
What is driving Cisco into the collaboration market?
Cisco believes that the collaboration market is in transition – that there are structural changes in the market that opens the door for Cisco to leverage its assets (voice, video, and networking) in ways that will enable it to take a leadership position. Understands the emergence and evolution of market shifts and the repercussions of those shifts to Cisco (pro and con)
· The following is Part 1 of a series on today's announcement by Cisco .
There are many reasons driving Cisco in this direction (revenue opportunities,
Collaborative Thinking
- Monday, November 9, 2009
-
-
Why History Is Relevant To The Future Of Collaboration
Far too often, when I read lofty articles on the current crop of "right answers" (blogs, wikis, social networks), it get the impression that people are unaware of the history being collaboration tools - we tend to focus on "the shiney new thing". Sometimes, you get the impression that collaboration tools are either something new (they're not), or that past attempt to improve collaboration via e-mail, forums, etc were failures (which is an over-simplistic argument - at the time, these tools garnered similar praise as today's 2.0 As I read this post by Dick Hirsch on the ESME blog, it reminded me how important it is to put technology into an historical context at times.
Collaborative Thinking
- Monday, January 5, 2009
|
|
|